El instinto del lenguaje: Steven Pinker, José Manuel Igoa González: Amazon. : Books. El Instinto del Lenguaje by Steven Pinker, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. The Paperback of the El instinto del lenguaje (The Language Instinct) by Steven Pinker at Barnes & Noble. FREE Shipping on $ or more!.
|Published (Last):||4 August 2005|
|PDF File Size:||6.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This learning machinery exists only during a specific critical period of childhood and is then disassembled for thrift, freeing resources in an energy-hungry brain.
By calling language an ppinker, Pinker means that it is not a human invention in the sense that metalworking and even writing are. He compares language to other species’ specialized adaptations such as spiders ‘ web-weaving or beavers ‘ dam-building behavior, calling all three ” instincts “. PsycholinguisticsEvolutionary psychology leenguaje, Evolutionary psychology of languageLinguistics. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Pinker argues that humans are born with an innate capacity for language.
Inztinto the Mind Creates Language Cover of the first edition. Pinker attempts to trace the outlines of the language instinct by citing his own studies of language acquisition in children, and the works of many other linguists and psychologists in multiple fields, as well as numerous examples from popular culture.
Pages to import images to Wikidata. How the Mind Works.
El Instinto del Lenguaje : Steven Pinker :
Webster believes that such speculations strengthen supporters of extreme genetic determinism. Books by Steven Pinker. While only some human cultures possess these technologiesall cultures possess language. The Language Instinct is a book by Steven Pinkerwritten for a general audience. He deals sympathetically with Noam Chomsky ‘s claim that all human language pinekr evidence of a universal grammarbut dissents from Chomsky’s skepticism that evolutionary theory can explain the human language instinct.
However, Webster finds Pinker’s speculation about other specialized neural networks that may intinto evolved within the human brain—such as “intuitive mechanics” and “intuitive biology”—to be questionable, and believes that there is a danger that they will be treated by others as science.
Why Freud Was Wrong: Sin, Science and Psychoanalysis. Retrieved from ” https: This page was last edited on 25 Decemberat Richard Websterwriting in Why Freud Was Wrongconcludes that Pinker argues cogently that the human capacity for language is part of the genetic endowment associated with the evolution through natural selection of specialised neural networks within the brain, and that its attack on the ‘ standard social science model ‘ of human nature is lengujae.
Pinker sees language as an ability unique pinkef humans, produced by evolution to solve the specific problem of communication among social hunter-gatherers.
Much of the book refers to Chomsky’s concept of a universal grammara meta-grammar into which all human languages fit. Cover of the first edition. As further evidence for lengiaje universality of language, Pinker—mainly relying on the work of Derek Bickerton —notes that children spontaneously invent a consistent grammatical speech a creole even if they grow up among a mixed-culture population speaking an informal trade pidgin with no consistent rules.
Pinker explains that a universal grammar represents specific structures in the human brain that recognize the general rules of other humans’ speech, such as whether the local language places adjectives before or after nouns, and begin a specialized and very rapid learning process not explainable as reasoning instinyo first principles or pure logic.
These signs suggest that rather than being a human invention, language is an innate human ability. Views Piker Edit View history.
El Instinto del Lenguaje
Webster accepts Pinker’s argument that, for ideological motives, twentieth-century social scientists have minimized the extent to which human nature is influenced by genetics. Pinker also distinguishes language from humans’ general reasoning ability, emphasizing that it is not simply a mark of advanced intelligence but rather a specialized “mental module”. He distinguishes the linguist’s notion of grammar, such as the placement of adjectives, from formal rules such as those in the American English writing style guide.
He argues that because rules like “a preposition is not a proper word to end a sentence with” must be explicitly taught, they are irrelevant to actual communication and should be ignored. Deaf babies “babble” with their hands as others normally do with voice, and spontaneously invent sign languages with true grammar rather than a crude “me Tarzan, you Jane” pointing system.
He notes, for instance, that specific types of brain damage cause specific impairments of language such as Broca’s aphasia or Wernicke’s aphasiathat specific types of grammatical construction are especially hard to understand, and that there seems to onstinto a critical period in childhood pinjer language development just as there is a critical period for vision development in cats.
Pinker’s assumptions about the innateness of language have been challenged; English linguist Geoffrey Sampson claims that “either the logic is fallacious, or the factual data are incorrect or, sometimes, both “. Pinker criticizes a number of common ideas about language, for example that children must be taught to use it, that most people’s grammar is poor, that the quality of language is steadily declining, that the kind of linguistic facilities that a language provides for example, some languages have words to describe dl and dark, but no words for colorshas a heavy influence on a person’s possible range of thoughts the Sapir—Whorf hypothesisand that nonhuman animals have been taught language see Great Ape language.