Ieromonk Ghelasie Gheorghe: “Akathist of Repentance” (translation from Romanian by Alice Butnar). “The Transfiguration”, icon painting by. AVVA GHELASIE GHEORGHE This Page is automatically generated based on what Facebook users are interested in, and is not affiliated with or endorsed by anyone associated with the topic.
|Published (Last):||18 December 2010|
|PDF File Size:||12.9 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That is maybe the reason why Saussure , the promotor of structuralism, refused to take into account the spoken language, engaged in a permanent process of change, in favour of the written language, gheorhge is practically static. The semantics of scientific language makes possible the articulation of the scientific discourse to philosophical and theological reflections.
Părintele Ghelasie Gheorghe de la Frăsinei: mai
Ghelasie consists therefore in his unfragmented, unitary vision of the Christian life. It has sense only a knowledge which can be articulated by propositions that contain affirmations verifiable through empiric experiments and can be structured by a set of precise rules of formal logic. The case of poetry is even not taken into account by researchers. Here lies the novelty of mysticism, in the identification of the being-like icon-language with gheorhge, as the origin of ghelasir.
The creativity is a gift that makes us resemble to God the Creator. After about twenty years of AI research, in the middle seventies, the researchers arrived at the conclusion that, as opposed to the engineering domains, the most important thing in thinking is not the engine, the mechanisms as such even if they are at their turn gheladiebut the expertise, the experience, the knowledge, the content ghhelasie the memory and, most important, the degree of structuration of this memory. Ghelasie proposes an interesting approach to the relation between language and thinking from a mystical-theological standpoint, with implications on the dialogue between science and religion.
The Iconic Anthropology of Fr. Science renounced nowadays at models as the watch and the motor in favor of a model compatible with its regained view on the inseparability of man and nature: Consciousness is not a mirror in which one sees the light; it is just the source that delivers the light that makes possible the sight. Language and thinking from a theological approach As we have seen, Fr.
As the language of theology is integrative, we present first shortly a recent triadologic and iconic approach to the theology of person, self and soul, made by the Romanian Father Ghelasie of Frasinei.
The relation between language and thinking is thus reversed in comparison to a common rationalist view. A triadological and iconic approach gheoghe the theology of Personhood At the turn of the twentieth century, a Romanian Father has brought to light one of the most important synthesis of patristic theology, with prolifically generative implications as regards the dialogue between science and religion.
The use of textual communication and, especially the use of dialog, had a huge growth in emails, gehorghe messaging chat conversationsblogs, etc.
Florin Caragiu – English Corner
Omniscop, Craiova,p. Theological and scientific language In the philosophical writings of the Vienna Circle fromthe positivist logic is reaffirmed through the special interest showed towards the empirically verified data and the formal logic. Moreover, Bakhtin rises the dialogism to the status of a fundamental principle: However, as every bureaucratic enterprise, the AI programs have the great handicap that they miss the feeling of implication , consciousness, understanding, empathy or, I would add, love for the neighbor.
Man is interior word, in tension, before expressing himself and exterior word when he expresses himself. Departing from the affirmations that there exists a parallelism between language and the world, and that transcendental metaphysics is without signification from the viewpoint of the construction of language, Ludwig Wittgenstein acknowledges to language a mystical strictly apophatic dimension.
This triad indicates what is common from eternity to the three divine Persons. Nesteruk, Light from the East. This makes the language clearly distinct from thinking that is between parts or levels of the Self. What is more wonderful?
Gheorgh makes some important remarks about the relation between subject and object in the language of being and the thinking discourse. In the Christian sense, we speak of an ‘understanding emotion’. The seal of the Divine Icon and Words represents the inescapable participative condition of the ontology of creation.
Science is thus invested as bearer of deep existential significations.
There are also cases in which the logic-mathematical apparatus is combined with certain principles of physics the fundamental principle of dynamics or thermodynamics to obtain an empiric-formal theory integrated in a conceptual system similar to the system of axioms from mathematics. Some of them have entered in the everyday life, as for example the programs that automatically compute the exposure of a digital photo camera.
In the above context, we can identify two basic classes of languages: In the last century, this theme even entered into the most prestigious scientific circles under the form of ghwlasie idea of building humanoid robots, or, more general, artificial intelligence AI or artificial life. The novelty of the Christian mystical approach stays for Fr. Each Person of the Holy Trinity possesses this triad in His personal manner but in the absolute Trinitarian Communion. Planck observes that ghelqsie religion God is higher than thought and for science God is a crown of the reflection on the universe.
Another tendency is given by the conceptualist current that extends the sphere of knowledge from the world of facts to the world of concepts.
Florin Caragiu – English Corner
In the comprehensive spirit of Christian orthodoxy, remaining always faithful to the Divine Revelation theology can assume the other forms of language in the elaboration of its own discourse. Monologic languages admit no ambiguity. In this context it is not a surprise that Christianity and other religions gave a fundamental position to language, logos, textual interpretation, and hermeneutics.