Software companies which have been involved in a process improvement programme according to ISO/IEC are showing an increasing interest in the . INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition. Information ISO’s member body in the country of the requester. ISO copyright. INTERNATIONAL. STANDARD. ISO/IEC. Second edition ISO/IEC exemplar software life cycle Process Assessment.
|Published (Last):||10 February 2006|
|PDF File Size:||3.72 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.87 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There are five general and industry models in use. In general, they are laid out to incorporate the assessment model indicators, including the base practice indicators and generic practice indicators. This is an elaboration of the process reference model PRM provided by the process lifecycle standards.
The process assessment model in part 6 is based on the process reference model for systems: The assessor validates this data to ensure it is accurate and completely covers the assessment 155045.
The oso part is currently in an advanced Final Draft Standard form  and work has started on part 8.
An organization considering outsourcing software development needs to have a good understanding of the capability of potential suppliers to deliver.
The organization can determine ido target capability for suppliers, based on the organization’s needs, and then assess suppliers against a set of target process profiles that specify this target capability.
One of the requirements is 1550-5 use a conformant assessment method for the assessment process. The specific problem is: Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. With new parts being published, the process categories will expand, particularly for IT service process categories and enterprise process categories.
This section’s factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. The international standard defines nine process attributes:. ISO standards by standard number.
Work on extending the value of capability determination includes a method called Practical Process Profiles – which uses risk as the determining factor in setting target process profiles.
Computer programming Requirements engineering Software deployment Software design Software maintenance Software testing Systems analysis Formal methods. The rating is based upon evidence collected against the practice indicators, which demonstrate fulfillment of the process attribute. For a successful assessment, the assessor must have a suitable level of the relevant skills and experience. Views Read Edit View history.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Safety extension van Loon, H. The reference model defines a process dimension and a capability dimension.
ISO/IEC – Wikipedia
This was expanded to 15504–5 all related processes in a software business, for example project managementconfiguration managementquality assuranceand so on. ISO provides a standard for assessing the organization’s capacity to deliver at each of these 155044-5.
The assessor assesses this data using his expert judgment against a process’s base practices and the capability dimension’s generic practices in the process rating step. This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia’s quality standards.
In addition there are methods available that adapt its use to various contexts. Retrieved from ” https: An assessor can collect data on a process by various means, including interviews with persons performing the process, collecting documents and quality records, and collecting statistical process data.
Computer science Computer engineering Project management Risk management Systems engineering. There are a limited number of computer based tools that present the indicators and allow users to enter the assessment judgment and notes in formatted screens, as well as automate the collated assessment result i.
The actual method is not specified in the standard although the standard places requirements on the method, method developers and assessors using the method.
SPICE is still used for the user group of the standard, and the title for the annual conference. The issued standard now specifies the measurement framework and can use different process reference models. January Learn how and when to remove this template message. It specifies requirements for improvement programmes and provides guidance on planning and executing improvements, including a description of an eight step improvement programme.
The simplest comprise paper-based tools. This was proposed from Japan when the TRs were published at In a few cases, there may be feedback requiring further assessment before a final process rating is made.
The process rating is then presented as a preliminary finding to the sponsor and preferably also to the 1504-5 assessed to ensure that they agree that the assessment is accurate. The process assessment model PAM is the detailed model used for an actual assessment. The capability of processes is measured using process attributes. Process rating requires some exercising of expert judgment on the part of the assessor and this is the reason that there are requirements on assessor qualifications and competency.
The 51504-5 versions of the standard focused exclusively on software development processes. This page was last edited on 12 Juneat This also enables suppliers to identify gaps between their current capability and the level required by a potential customer, and to undertake improvement to achieve the contract requirements i.
Following this improvement programme is not mandatory and several alternative improvement programmes exist. The list of processes covered grew to cover six business areas: