Turkish is spoken by about fifty million people in Turkey and is the co-official Jaklin Kornfilt provides a wealth of examples drawn from different levels of. Fields, Syntax and morphology of Turkish and the Turkic languages. Institutions, Syracuse University. Influenced, Noam Chomsky. Jaklin Kornfilt is a theoretical linguist, working at Syracuse University. Contents. 1 Education; 2. : Turkish (Descriptive Grammars) (): Jaklin Kornfilt: Books.
|Published (Last):||2 January 2013|
|PDF File Size:||1.51 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||18.57 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This distribution of information no doubt reflects both the interests of the author and the current emphasis of typological research. Only one Turkic language, Chuvash, spoken on the middle Volga, is radically different from all its relatives. Eine Studie zum kontaktinduzierten Sprachwandel ; Wiesbaden: The goals of the works in this series are different from those of most grammars: In the very first paragraph on page 1, for example, she uses the terms ‘nominalized clause’ and ‘constituent clause,’ neither of which is likely to be familiar to non-linguists.
She also studies German turkisu the Germanic languages. Rumelian, Anatolian and South Crimean. Sat, 02 May Selected pages Title Page. Jaklin Kornfilt provides a wealth of examples drawn from different levels of vocabulary: Turkish is spoken by about fifty million turkksh in Turkey and is the co-official language of Cyprus. Thus we find on page the statement kronfilt postpostitions govern only one case with the lone exception of ‘kadar’.
In terms of linguistic structure, kotnfilt Turkic languages are very close to one another, and.
Turkish Jaklin Kornfilt No preview available – Reshaping Theoretical and Geographical Boundaries ; B. The chapters on phonology and the lexicon are both very well done and very useful more on this turkishhbut they do not address all of the issues that might be of interest to a phonologist or a lexical semanticist.
A far more frequent pattern of subordination involves the use of a participial or nominalized verbal stem. Although there is no general turiksh in Turkological literature on the most adequate. Uzbek, Kazakh, Turkmenian, Kirghiz and on the Volga e.
Turkish – Jaklin Kornfilt – Google Books
The chapter on phonology is short, kornfil, and precise, but it does not contain the amount of detail found in the syntax and morphology chapters. It will supplement but will not replace Lewis and Underhill First, Kornfilt assumes familiarity with linguistic terminology.
But the largest number of Turkish speakers outside Turkey, perhaps close to one million, is to be found in the Balkans, especially in Bulgaria, but also in the former Yugoslavia particularly in Macedonia and in Greece. Her articles have included topics on binding, relativization, word order, nominalization, and first language acquisition. Also included is a list of just over items gurkish “Basic Vocabulary,” which seems to correspond kronfilt the so-called Swadesh List. Kornfilt graduated from Heidelberg University with a bachelor’s degree in applied linguistics and translation studies in According to the editorial preface, the series gives preference to languages for which comprehensive descriptions are not presently available iv.
The analyses are up to date and insightful, and Kornfilt has done a superb job of bringing clarity to some of the most difficult parts of the language. Steve Seegmiller is interested universal and comparative grammar.
Some of these are listed below:. On page 27, for hurkish, Turkish is described as a ‘subject-verb-object language. Psychology Press- Foreign Language Study – pages. The external genetic relationships of the Turkic family remain controversial. She earned a PhD again in theoretical linguistics from the same university in Whilst Turkish has a number of properties that are similar to those of other Turkic languages, it has distinct and interesting characteristics which are given full coverage in this book.
Edited By Bernard Comrie. Essays in Honor of Karl Zimmer ; E.
Turkkish notable feature of the book is the extensive and detailed Table of Contents. This is unfortunate; since the book is so useful, linguists interested in Turkish will want to have it close at hand.
Her treatment of other aspects of Turkish morphology and syntax are equally well done. It is, simply put, an admirable reference work on Turkish for linguists.
He has been working on Turkish and the other Turkic languages for many years, and published the first grammar in English of the Turkic language Karachay. The author is aware of some of the errors and has prepared an Addendum which contains a short list of errata, but many of the errors that I found are not included. The largest linguistic minority in the Turkish Republic is formed by Kurdish speakers, mainly in southeastern Turkey; small minority language communities are formed by speakers of Arabic, of some Caucasian languages, and, especially in the European part of the country, by speakers of Gagauz, a closely related Turkic language primarily spoken in Moldova.
The chapter contains lists of words organized by semantic field. Oxford University Press; Furthermore, a good deal of the information in the Morphology chapter deals with syntactic matters, giving the book an especially heavy bias toward syntax. Ottomanwhich would consist of the following dialects: The Addendum is available free of charge from the author or the publisher. This is tuurkish essential information for linguists whether studying typology, syntax, or morphology and is rarely included in more traditional grammars.